Sebastian Siewior wrote:
Greg Ungerer wrote:
Sebastian Siewior wrote:
Greg Ungerer wrote:
Sebastian Siewior wrote:
May we agree on a git tree? This would make things easier I guess.
Even
Russell has one these days :) This would atleast avoid [2]. And if you
remove the stack address in my other patch please let me know or
alteast
leave a not in the patch description that you edit it.
Uh, I told you I prefered something else, I changed it.
There was no need for you to regenerate anything.
Yes I know. I just ask you gently to get / see your patches in one or
other way before they hit mainline without a review from someone.
This would avoid the fec mess for instance and things like [2].
I don't want to push the point, but there is no fec mess from
my point of view. The other fixes to the fec driver where from
others on this list, and via this list. Or for my interrupt
changes for example thet where from an earlier discussion on
this list, and again posted to this list. So they are not
un-reviewed or new.
You told me twice that there were patches and you mentioned one (the
interrupt one). I checked the ml archive on mail-archive.com which
starts in July and did not find them. Anyway.
Is it too much to ask to upload your patches somewhere?
Do you want my rebased fec patches or don't care anymore since the
driver is working?
Sure. If you rebase them against 2.6.26-rc1 that would be useful.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Chief Software Dude EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secure Computing Corporation PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
