No, it is not the erase block size. Yes, the _erase_ blocks are much larger, and there lies the problem. If you don't do multiple block writes for consecutive sectors, you will end up causing an erase for each block you write on the erase sized block. It will also be very slow.
Is this really hardware - _"erase"_ - block ? > > Off-the-shelf flash chips use _much_ larger erase blocks to reduce the > price. > > -Michael >
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
