Hi Jody, If by that you mean the site that maven does it's downloads will get new geotools with the correct MANIFEST.MF settings (like Andreas geotools) then that would be great. In the meantime I'm using Andreas Geotools and avoiding running refresh.xml (since that would download the bad stuff again).
By the way, do you want me to log a bug on JIRA for this? It is a 'deployment' bug in some sense. Cheers, Craig On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]>wrote: > I will deploy geotools locally here again. > Jody > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We should be on geoapi-2.3-SNAPSHOT - as such I updated refresh.xml > yesterday. > > > > Jody > > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Craig Taverner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> In trying to setup a udig development environment today, I ended up > spending > >> an inordinate amount of time solving a problem with the libs download > >> including geoapi-2.2 instead of the correct geoapi-2.3. After much > trouble, > >> deleting all jars and all contents of .m2 with no success, I finally got > the > >> right jars from Andrea (who builds his own geotools, and had the right > >> stuff). Comparing Andrea's stuff to what is downloaded from both > >> http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools and > >> http://maven.geotools.fr/repository/ (tested both), I found that if I > >> unpacked one of the geotools jars, and compared the contents between the > >> downloaded version and Andreas version, the most striking difference was > >> that the relevant MANIFEST.MF files depended on different geoapi > versions. > >> > >> So the problem appears to be that the geotools-2.6-SNAPSHOT jars > downloaded > >> by maven were built with MANIFEST.MF files that depend on geoapi-2.2. In > the > >> case of gt-api, this was built on the 25th February, so it is possible > that > >> at least since then this problem has been there. I can guess that > sometime > >> before that the MANIFEST.MF file had the correct dependency on > geoapi-2.3, > >> but someone changed it. > >> > >> I thought perhaps this has not been noticed because all developers also > >> build their own geotools, but I would think that they would also get the > bad > >> MANIFEST.MF from the geotools repository, so I'm not sure what's going > on, > >> unless whomever is doing the official geotools build has a local edit. > >> > >> I edited the wiki with some information about this. > >> > >> Cheers, Craig > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> http://udig.refractions.net > >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
