No need we can sort it out on the developers list - I wonder. I will go over what I can on this end. Jody
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Craig Taverner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jody, > > If by that you mean the site that maven does it's downloads will get new > geotools with the correct MANIFEST.MF settings (like Andreas geotools) then > that would be great. In the meantime I'm using Andreas Geotools and avoiding > running refresh.xml (since that would download the bad stuff again). > > By the way, do you want me to log a bug on JIRA for this? It is a > 'deployment' bug in some sense. > > Cheers, Craig > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I will deploy geotools locally here again. >> Jody >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > We should be on geoapi-2.3-SNAPSHOT - as such I updated refresh.xml >> > yesterday. >> > >> > Jody >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Craig Taverner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> In trying to setup a udig development environment today, I ended up >> >> spending >> >> an inordinate amount of time solving a problem with the libs download >> >> including geoapi-2.2 instead of the correct geoapi-2.3. After much >> >> trouble, >> >> deleting all jars and all contents of .m2 with no success, I finally >> >> got the >> >> right jars from Andrea (who builds his own geotools, and had the right >> >> stuff). Comparing Andrea's stuff to what is downloaded from both >> >> http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools and >> >> http://maven.geotools.fr/repository/ (tested both), I found that if I >> >> unpacked one of the geotools jars, and compared the contents between >> >> the >> >> downloaded version and Andreas version, the most striking difference >> >> was >> >> that the relevant MANIFEST.MF files depended on different geoapi >> >> versions. >> >> >> >> So the problem appears to be that the geotools-2.6-SNAPSHOT jars >> >> downloaded >> >> by maven were built with MANIFEST.MF files that depend on geoapi-2.2. >> >> In the >> >> case of gt-api, this was built on the 25th February, so it is possible >> >> that >> >> at least since then this problem has been there. I can guess that >> >> sometime >> >> before that the MANIFEST.MF file had the correct dependency on >> >> geoapi-2.3, >> >> but someone changed it. >> >> >> >> I thought perhaps this has not been noticed because all developers also >> >> build their own geotools, but I would think that they would also get >> >> the bad >> >> MANIFEST.MF from the geotools repository, so I'm not sure what's going >> >> on, >> >> unless whomever is doing the official geotools build has a local edit. >> >> >> >> I edited the wiki with some information about this. >> >> >> >> Cheers, Craig >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >> http://udig.refractions.net >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >> >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> http://udig.refractions.net >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
