Fine for me. Also I think it is a good idea, since the presence of both jars has give problems in the past.
Andrea On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote: > In talking with aaime on #geotools; the performance experiment in epsg-h2 > has not paid off (the normal epsh-hsql jar is as fast). With that in mind he > would like to retire it in order to have less work each time a new epsg > database comes out. > We were mostly interested in it so we did not have to have both hsql and h2 > drivers. > So this is a general question: Are we strongly attached to epsg-h2 or can we > try out switching this week. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
