> Hi Andrea; seems a lot of people on IRC discussing / planning the proposal.
> To answer your question: When we do make a uDig 2.0 it better have a lot
> more functionality otherwise we would just be laughed at.
> Changing the internals (while it may break compatibility) does not feel like
> a uDig 2.0 "product".
> Would it be okay if we just went to uDig 1.3.0 for this change?

I remember that once I asked you how to handle the 3 numbers in a version.
I think you answered me that breaking the API would require a new
major number change.

I think with this change the project would change. If also the tools
palette comes in and a few minor additions (I could bring temporal
support with netcdf in again) that would be a great candidate for 2.0.
Don't you?
And btw, people have been laughing about our release times for many
years, why should we stop keeping people happy? :D

Ciao,
Andrea


> Jody
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:00 PM, andrea antonello
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Same here, my +1 stands.
>>
>> I have one question though. It is about the versioning. This change
>> will break any compatibility with past stuff. Shouldn't this be a 2.0
>> version?
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Thanks Jesse!
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Jesse Eichar <[email protected]>
>> > Date: 2011/8/9
>> > Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote on RFC "Next generation resource
>> > persistence in uDig"
>> > To: Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Kenneth Gulbrandsoy <[email protected]>, geotools dev
>> > <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> > I gave it a +1 as well
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Okay ran through the page:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> * http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/Common+Data+Objects+resource+persistence
>> >> * Renamed it to be specific (ie the change is the use of CDO rather
>> >> than
>> >> EMF for persistence)
>> >> * Changed the target to 1.3.0 (rather than uDig 2.0)
>> >> * Broke up some of the tasks to be more specific; would like to list
>> >> volunteer names next to tasks if possible
>> >> * Listed schedule constraints beyond "Fall 2011"
>> >> * Add a +1 next to my name
>> >> * Added your name with a +1 under committeer support
>> >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi PMC!
>> >>> The "Next generation resource persistence in uDig" RFC is now ready to
>> >>> receive votes from members of the PMC (and committers).
>> >>> I would like to get starting as soon as possible on this. It would be
>> >>> nice to get complete the vote this week.
>> >>> I'm a committer, so obviously I'm +1
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Kenneth
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> BlackBerry&reg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
>> >>> The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts.
>> >>> Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies.
>> >>> Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save!
>> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model
>> >> configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion
>> >> and
>> >> the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a
>> >> free
>> >> download at:  http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Geotools-devel mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>> > http://udig.refractions.net
>> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>> http://udig.refractions.net
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel

Reply via email to