I unfortunately do not have access to winXP only win7.  I looked up the
commit:

https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/commit/f4d9aba3707c8898092d667ce9c9abf7ee3c6290

It is also the commit where I accidently deleted the csw stuff.

Jesse

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]>wrote:

> Ah that would make some sense - that is good I was not aware of any changes
> that could of produced this kind of trouble. My next guess was to be a
> change at the geotools level.
>
>  Wow this was a frustrating one to track down - wonder why it does not show
> up in windows 7.
>
> Do you have access to a winXP VM or should I set myself up a play pen.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 07/10/2011, at 6:46 PM, Jesse Eichar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jody maybe that is my fault.  I made some changes to take into account
> symbolic links when searching and so changed the URI comparison method to
> look if the URIs are file URIs.  I also change the ID class.  Maybe one of
> those two are breaking things on XP.
>
> Jesse
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Jody Garnett < <[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  I have just tested the same installer on Windows 7 and it still works. So
>> this is a Windows XP specific problem.
>>
>> Can I ask if anyone has a Windows XP development environment set up and
>> could have a look into this? It should be as simple as adding a layer and
>> telling us what your can find in the debugger?
>> Hang at the geotools
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On Friday, 7 October 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>
>>  Okay I need to give this error a name; the good news is I can now
>> reproduce it in a Windows XP VM. Thus far I have only seen it on Windows XP.
>> Earlier testing on Windows 7 seemed okay (indeed that is how I updated
>> walkthrough 1 and walkthrough 2 so I am not sure what is up ...).
>>
>> The error shows up when any layer you add to the map; shows up as "new
>> Layer". It looks like shapefile resource cannot resolve to a DataStore; and
>> thus the code that would normally determine layer name; default style and so
>> on does not get a chance to function.
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>>  <http://udig.refractions.net>http://udig.refractions.net
>>  <http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel>
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel

Reply via email to