I will push my 1.2.3 branch to upstream (so we can apply any patches out of your testing today).
This is the result of the conversation on udig-devel some months ago with respect to choosing 1.2.3 or 1.3.0 when considering the roadmap for the tool palette and CDO work. So the basis is the sheer hope that the CDO work will come onto master before we make the next release; and thus justify the 1.3.0 label. -- Jody Garnett On Wednesday, 12 October 2011 at 5:38 PM, andrea antonello wrote: > Hi Jody, > does that mean that it is sure we won't have any 1.2.4? > Just to understand on which base you did this? > > Andrea > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > Just a heads up (for those working and making pull requests) please update > > the version number of any plugin you modify to say 1.3.0 (which should be > > the next release). > > -- > > Jody Garnett > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > http://udig.refractions.net > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
