Ok, I remember the CDO work, but was hoping that we would call the master 1.3.0 only shortly before starting with it. Given the current status of GIT knowledge around I am afraid that it will generate caos :)
Andrea On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote: > I will push my 1.2.3 branch to upstream (so we can apply any patches out of > your testing today). > This is the result of the conversation on udig-devel some months ago with > respect to choosing 1.2.3 or 1.3.0 when considering the roadmap for the tool > palette and CDO work. > So the basis is the sheer hope that the CDO work will come onto master > before we make the next release; and thus justify the 1.3.0 label. > -- > Jody Garnett > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2011 at 5:38 PM, andrea antonello wrote: > > Hi Jody, > does that mean that it is sure we won't have any 1.2.4? > Just to understand on which base you did this? > > Andrea > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Just a heads up (for those working and making pull requests) please update > the version number of any plugin you modify to say 1.3.0 (which should be > the next release). > -- > Jody Garnett > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
