Thanks so far, I have seen the "release" branch but had no clue what it is for ... And there is also a "real" 1.2.x branch that was created from git svn (https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/tree/1.2.x) properly we could rename or tag 1.2.x to something else and rename the "release" branch to 1.2.x I guess that is what everybody would expect if looking at listed branches.
Anyway, I try to figure out how to do this ... but I'm still confused about the structure right now. Furthermore I've now idea what the branch "fpagnamenta" is for, I guess Jessy can clarify .. -Frank and created a local branch 1.2.x with the git command : git checkout 2011/10/19 Jody Garnett <[email protected]>: > Frank can I ask you to fill in your tasks on > the http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/1.2.3 page? > But to repeat there is already a branch for this release called "release". > So we can stay away from the churn as master gets maven enabled. > -- > Jody Garnett > > On Tuesday, 18 October 2011 at 11:02 PM, Frank Gasdorf wrote: > > Hello folks, > > I started reviewing some open issues. For Ticket > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/UDIG-1757 Andrea already merged the > pull request into the master repository but I'm wondering that we > haven't created a 1.2.x branch so far. > > The main reason why we should have created the branch for 1.2.x > bugfixes are the major changes on GEF Palette, upgrade to Indigo as > well as the build system (PDE ant to maven) changes on the master > repository. > > I would like to suggest to create a branch afterwards for the tagged > release 1.2.2 > (https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/commit/a6bb2ceaa07c25d7c0fba8349fdf8f7d1c2eab46 > --- http://udig.refractions.net/files/downloads/udig-1.2.2.html). > > IMHO the changes from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3 are major and therefore I would > prefer a 1.3.0 release instead. Is it possible: > - to create a branch afterwards in git repositories -- I guess > there is a way ? > - Is it possible to rethink version number for the current release > train -- sorry for being late on this one :( -- and switch over to > 1.3.0 instead ? > > What do you think about? Feedback is warmly welcome!! > > Cheers, Frank > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
