This is a better fix (test added to avoid a crash if no camera/lens has
been selected):
diff --git a/ufraw_ufraw.c b/ufraw_ufraw.c
index 120e6a1..9eea022 100644
--- a/ufraw_ufraw.c
+++ b/ufraw_ufraw.c
@@ -1361,6 +1361,12 @@ int ufraw_flip_image(ufraw_data *uf, int flip)
if ( uf->conf->threshold>0 )
ufraw_flip_image_buffer(&uf->Images[ufraw_denoise_phase], flip);
ufraw_flip_image_buffer(&uf->Images[ufraw_develop_phase], flip);
+#ifdef HAVE_LENSFUN
+ if (uf->modifier &&
+ (uf->postproc_ops & (LF_MODIFY_TCA | LF_MODIFY_DISTORTION |
+ LF_MODIFY_GEOMETRY | LF_MODIFY_SCALE)))
+ ufraw_flip_image_buffer(&uf->Images[ufraw_lensfun_phase], flip);
+#endif
return UFRAW_SUCCESS;
}
It would be better though to factor the LF_* flags testing out: there are
too many tests for this already (with- or without LF_MODIFY_VIGNETTING).
Note that there still seems to be a minor bitrot issue in rotated +
flipped lensfun previews but no SIGSEGV anymore: I think it's a second bug,
also reproducable in stock 0.15
--
Frank
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
ufraw-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
