On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 08:03 -0500, Ryan Krauss wrote: > I don't believe that my camera in jpeg mode uses low quality (it has > various options, but I shoot at the highest one in jpeg mode) and the > file size difference is dramatic (3x). So, I think there is more > going on here than a quality setting.
Most camera JPEGs in their highest quality are usually at JPEG quality 96 or so with 4:2:2 (horizontal) subsampling. Which is not the highest possible quality at all. Real quality, and visible quality are very different things! Anyway, try the following JPEG qualities (if I'm not mistaken): JPEG Quality 89 or lower, with with horizontal and vertical subsampling JPEG Quality 90-92 with only horizontal subsampling JPEG Quality 93+ with no subsampling You're probably looking for JPEG Quality 92, which you can set on the second to last tab. Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ufraw-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
