On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:01:45AM +0000, Omari Stephens wrote: > > Also, I see the tiles are rendered in a raster format which is aborted if > > a slider is changed, then they update starting again from the top. > > Perhaps it would appear more responsive to start again where it left off > > instead, continuing around in a ring. This would avoid cases where only > > the top few tiles update during a continuous drag. I'll take a look. > > I consider this a feature. When I'm dragging some slider, I can generally > see > the difference between "what it would look like" and "what it looked like > originally." If you just kept wrapping around, you'd have a variable, > constantly-outdated reference as opposed to the stable reference we have now. > Of course, if the display were to update instantaneously you'd again have no > stable reference, but I think the current behavior is still better than one > where you wrap around. I presume the code is also simpler this way as well.
I hacked it in there (just a "rover" variable that saves where it left off), and I think I agree. It actually feels slower, simply because your eyes don't see all of the tiles updating. I also find that the top half of the image is enough for guesstimating the temperature of the rest of the image as well. I was then thinking maybe some kind of leaky rovering, but yeah, that's just silly. Simon- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ ufraw-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
