On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Manish Chakravarty
<manishchaks at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I am running build 94 inside VMware on my mac. I dont notice a speed
> difference.
> Maybe it's a problem with only bare metal installs then (though I find
> this problem weird. Solaris/OpenSolaris has one of the best networking
> stacks. Network performance should be atleast on par with Windows if
> not better )

   It is after all software and it is software's fundamental right to have bugs.
   I'd suspect a driver bug.

Regards,
Moinak.

>
> Thanks
> Manish
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Shishir Pandey <durvasa86 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Harsha,
>> I've pretty much the same problem, I'm running build 91 though. I have
>> another interesting
>> observation ie when I boot in xVM the download speeds are good.
>>
>> Angad,
>> I'm not entirely sure about how Harsha calculated his download speeds but
>> I've measured speed on-line via speedtest.net, and done a simple traceroute
>> and using ping and ntop, all fairly simple in essence but do tell me
>> sufficient information.
>> for example
>> in xVM
>>    tracroute to www.google.com ----> normally takes under 30ms for me
>>    ping to www.google.com --> nearly the same number (with no packet loss)
>>    ntop tells me that speeds' 1.6 mbps (I've a 2 mbps connection)
>> in regular kernel (not running in xVM)
>>    traceroute to www.google.com ---> 1027 ms (This is virtually the
>> case at each hop)
>>    ping to www.google.com ---> 1186ms (with 20% packet loss)
>>    ntop tells me that speed is 102 kbps ( just to re-iterate I've a
>> 2mbps connection)
>>
>> And the load avg on my machine in both the cases was around 0.3*.
>>
>> An equally interesting fact is that on Linux (dual boot) the connection
>> works like a charm.
>>
>> I have so far compared the kstats outputs after running the system in
>> two modes, after nearly
>> same time and (almost) same amount of data transfers, and found nothing
>> which was drastically
>> different. No changes from netstat, the same modules are loaded etc etc.
>>
>> I posted the query to laptop-discus/osol-help after posting it to Hyd
>> user group and B'lore user
>> groups. I'll try the stuff on perf cd, but I'm really lost here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shishir
>>
>>
>> Angad Singh wrote:
>>> How are you measuring the speed? Performance Monitor?
>>>
>>> There is a useful tool called "netsum" which shows you exacty up/down
>>> speed per interface in KB/s as well as packets/s. It can be found in
>>> the Solaris Performance Tools CD:
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/partnertech/entry/solaris_performance_primer_understanding_the
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/partnertech/entry/solaris_performance_toolscd_3_0
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Harsha <Harsha.Sabarad at sun.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi ,
>>>>     Can any help me to increase my down load speed as its 113kb/s in
>>>> windows and just 13to max 15kb/s in solaris (nevada svx_93 build ) or if
>>>> its a bug please lemme know so that i can log the same .
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Harsha
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ug-bosug mailing list
>>>> List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ug-bosug-unsubscribe at opensolaris.org
>>>> List-Owner: mailto:ug-bosug-owner at opensolaris.org
>>>> List-Archives: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=54
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ug-bosug mailing list
>> List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ug-bosug-unsubscribe at opensolaris.org
>> List-Owner: mailto:ug-bosug-owner at opensolaris.org
>> List-Archives: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=54
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Manish Chakravarty
> http://manish-chaks.livejournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> ug-bosug mailing list
> List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ug-bosug-unsubscribe at opensolaris.org
> List-Owner: mailto:ug-bosug-owner at opensolaris.org
> List-Archives: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=54
>



-- 
================================
http://www.belenix.org/
http://moinakg.wordpress.com/

Reply via email to