From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ugnet_: And now this!-Baganda royals back 3rd term\matek Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:54:34 EST
In a message dated 12/10/2003 5:57:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> "it is the Kabaka and his appointed officials who speak for Buganda and not
> some unknown royals."
> Now that is very interesting if you are telling us that the appointed
> officials are more powerful in the Kingdom than the Royals. Mwaami
> Kasangwawo there is a reason why they are called Royals and you are not. And
> it frightens if we start to classify the Royals as who is close and who is
> not, who is distant and who is not. For a critical thinker can wonder which
> standards you use to decide who is a close Royal and who is a distant royal.
> For example you are now using Ssabalangira's words, is he among the distant
> or the close?
>
EM
Kansawawo simply does not know what he is talking about..he is more of It is pretty much futile to engaged him in a meaningful debt.
Matek
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
-------------------------------------------- This service is hosted on the Infocom network http://www.infocom.co.ug
