[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right. We don't want a Windoze/MacOS-like system where one *MUST* have a
> working GUI to be able to do anything. I'm personally a command line freak
> (the only icon I use is the one that launches xterm :), and as such, as
> believe the best way to go is to make sure the system is equally useful
> both from the command line and from the GUI. One should *NEVER* have to use
> the GUI to accomplish a certain task, just as one should *NEVER* have to use
> the command line to accomplish a certain task (in terms of configuring the
> system etc...).
> 
> Last time I browsed the Wiki it seemed that the general opinion is pretty
> much the same. Is that still true? I hope so.

It is, the point of JADE is to allow *any* UI to be used with JOS not to
make assumptions

Cheers,
DigiGod
_________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM:DigiGod 86
_________________________
Quote of the Moment:
        No, I'm Canadian. It's like an American, but without a 
        gun.
              -Dave Foley
_________________________
Prank of the Moment:
        Using the conferencing feature of your office phone, dial
        one Induhvidual, then while it's ringing dial another and
        conference them together. Put your own phone on mute
        and listen to see how long they'll make small talk before
        figuring out that neither one placed the call.
O-

_______________________________________________
UI maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/ui

Reply via email to