2009/6/16 LeHouillier, Frank D. <frank.lehouill...@gd-ais.com> > No, but you should look at the maven release plugin for handling the > change from 2.n-SNAPSHOT in (trunk) to 2.n (in tags) to 2.n+1-SNAPSHOT > (back in trunk). It should handle all of the SNAPSHOT dependencies > automatically rather than doing this by hand. As it stands now, are you > planning to change all the versions to 2.3.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT after > the release of 2.3.1-incubating? In general, I agree with Jukka, that > if I have a dependency that isn't labeled SNAPSHOT, I trust this version > not to change. Since we do sometimes build UIMA trunk internally, this > won't be the case if SNAPSHOT is abandoned forever.
I do agree > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thilo Goetz [mailto:twgo...@gmx.de] > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:12 AM > To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: 2.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT > > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Thilo Goetz<twgo...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> I guess I'm just displaying my maven ignorance here. Since > >> we're not uploading any snapshot artifacts to any maven > >> repos, does it still buy us anything? > > > > It does. If I build UIMA today, I get a SNAPSHOT version in my local > > Maven repository instead of a version that may later interfere with > > the final release. > > > > A SNAPSHOT can change from day to day, but a release version should > > always stay the same. > > Ok, by all means. Still, since the version number needs > to be updated in a gazillion places, and I've already made > a start, anybody object to me changing the version number > to 2.3.0-incubating (no snapshot) now, so we can catch all > the places that I'm sure to have missed until we finally > release? > > --Thilo > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Jukka Zitting >
