Olivier Terrier wrote: > Hi Marshall > > When I donated the BSFAnnotator about two years ago I was not very > familiar with the maven-based Apache UIMA build process... And I'm > afraid I'm still not be. > > >> While working on including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release, I >> noticed it has 6 jar files in its "lib" directory. The NOTICE file >> says >> that the project includes some components under MPL and SPL; however, >> the information needed to associate each of this included 3rd-party >> > jar > >> files with the proper license is missing. >> >> Can someone who knows identify the source of the following jars: >> >> bsf.jar >> > Apache 2 license > Comes from > http://apache.crihan.fr/dist/jakarta/bsf/binaries/bsf-bin-2.4.0.zip > > >> bsh-bsf.jar >> > No longer needed: can be removed > > >> bsh.jar >> > Dual licensed under both the SPL and LGPL => SPL is in the list of > acceptable licenses available here: > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > Can be replaced by http://www.beanshell.org/bsh-1.3.0.jar (which now > contains the bsh-bsf.jar classes) > > > >> commons-logging-api-1.1.jar >> > Apache 2 license > Comes from > http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/binaries/commons-logging- > 1.1.zip > > >> js.jar >> > Dual licensed under both the MPL 1.1 and GPL => MPL is in the list of > acceptable licenses available here: > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > Comes from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/rhino1_6R7.zip > > >> log4j-1.2.15.jar >> > Apache 2 license > Comes from > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/logging/log4j/1.2.15/apache-log4j-1 > .2.15.zip > > >> Is there a better way to package / distribute this in binary form? >> > Probably using maven dependencies but I don't have enough maven-skills > to do it myself > > >> Also, I noticed that the POM section for building the documentation is >> commented out - because there is no docbook style documentation. The >> documentation seems limited to a README and some examples. Is there >> additional documentation available for this? >> > No: just the README sorry > > I guess that a real revamping should use the JSR-223 (javax.script) > which is included in Java 1.6 and add support to new popular scripting > languages like groovy, beanshell 2.0 etc... > > >
Thanks for responding! I'll update the project with this information. -Marshall >> -Marshall >> > > >
