Thilo Goetz wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: > [...] > >> Both of these approaches put uimaj-core classes at the "root" level of >> the application (i.e., "System") class-loader chain. I can't think of >> any cases where that would not be OK; can anyone else? >> > > I think that may not work because the UIMA > framework classes need to access the annotator classes. > If the core is loaded by the system classloader, it > will not have access to classes loaded by the bs loader. > Yes, this sounds right.
How about this "fix": put a copy of the UIMALogFormatter into the bootstrap loader Jar. This class does not reference any uima classes, only Java JRE classes. -Marshall > --Thilo > > > >
