That is harsh Having had a look at pirate bay, the majority of material available is illegal - if it wasn't we wouldn't be blocking it..
Martin Macleod-Brown | Infrastructure Engineer – Networks & Security Direct line +44 (0)20 7000 7772 | Email mmacl...@london.edu www.london.edu Don't forget, you can now track and update your IT support calls using our new IT SelfService Connect with us: Follow us on Twitter Become a fan on Facebook Please consider the environment before printing this email -----Original Message----- From: uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk [mailto:uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk] On Behalf Of Anand Kumria Sent: 01 May 2012 16:40 To: Neil J. McRae Cc: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk Subject: Re: [uknof] Pirate Bay Block Your statement is agreeing to this logic: All drug dealers use phones. Therefore all people who use phones are drug dealers. Thus banning phones will reduce drug dealing. A On 1 May 2012 16:24, Neil J. McRae <n...@domino.org> wrote: > Whilst I personally believe that these solutions don't work as a standalone > option I think we also need to remember that many if not all of the people > downloading stuff via TPB are actually breaking the law. > > Regards, > Neil. > -- > Neil J. McRae. > n...@domino.org > > ________________________________________ > From: uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk > [uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk] on behalf of Steve Karmeinsky > [steve-uk...@gbnet.net] > Sent: 01 May 2012 14:10 > To: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk > Subject: Re: [uknof] Pirate Bay Block > > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 02:07:43PM +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote: > >> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:13 +0100, Steve Dyer wrote: >> > The order from the original court said that including the site in >> > "Cleanfeed" was sufficient to have actioned it. Cleanfeed, the >> > Judge knew, was trivial to circumvent, so he made the order in the >> > knowledge that it wouldn't actually work. >> That's genuinely fascinating. I can't find the actual judgement and >> subsequent direction handed to ISPs in this case - does anyone have a >> copy? > > They were ordered to use existing methods, not implement DPI/etc. > (which would then have fallen foul of the EU directive anyway). > > Steve > > -- > NetTek Ltd UK mob +44 7775 755503 > UK +44 20 3432 3735 / US +1 (206) 309-2461 / Fax +44 20 7483 2455 > social id stevekennedyuk Euro Tech News Blog > http://eurotechnews.blogspot.com MSN st...@gbnet.net > > > > > > > -- “Don’t be sad because it’s over. Smile because it happened.” – Dr. Seuss ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf of the London Business School community. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf of the London Business School community. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
