On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:13 +0100, Steve Dyer wrote: > The order from the original court said that including the site in > "Cleanfeed" was sufficient to have actioned it. Cleanfeed, the Judge > knew, was trivial to circumvent, so he made the order in the knowledge > that it wouldn't actually work.
That's genuinely fascinating. I can't find the actual judgement and subsequent direction handed to ISPs in this case - does anyone have a copy? Graeme
