On 20/01/16 17:14, Brian Candler wrote: > Maybe that's true for mobile phone networks, who often funnel clients > through their own NAT/proxy devices for the purposes of saving IP > addresses and compressing content. But it's clearly not the case for > fixed-line ISPs.
You may have forgotten that the bigger ISPs in the country were all "asked" by the Government to provide 'family filters' on new services, by default. I wouldn't be surprised if this gave them the idea that ICRs were things already being collected. -- Tom
