It's amazing how their karma sometimes runs over their dogma.
First they try to prohibit NAT boxes, to maximize the number of IP
addresses they can sell.
Then they run short of IP addresses, and then start supplying NAT boxes.
First they complain about bandwidth usage.
Then they sell their ability to stream movies and TV shows...
You'd think they're just a bunch of brainless boobs, wouldn't you???
On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Andrei Krotkov wrote:
I consider our household to be relatively normal, but we were
informed, after they cut out our service for a few days, that we were
the top 1% of the top 1%. They consider their top 1% to be their
problem users, and they send messages to the top 1% of their problem
users.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Peter Teuben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
i'm fine with going slower (which it is most of the time) than
1.6Mbits,
but --within reason-- I don't like the idea of having to track down
my usage and
pay for every GB i'm over the limit.
My understanding is that the capping is driven by an abuse of a
very small
minority of users.
- peter
