Jennifer, 
  I have learned a great deal from your posts, thank you! As I read your 
description of the needs of this group I thought about purposes for reading. 
I'm not familiar  with the assessment you are using or the text you are 
reading. But I wondered would starting with a question to "invite the readers 
in" help with focusing their thinking on what your goals were for instruction? 



In a message dated 11/14/08 14:09:49 Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
Send Understand mailing list submissions to 
   understand@literacyworkshop.org 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
   http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org 

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

You can reach the person managing the list at 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
than "Re: Contents of Understand digest..." 


Today's Topics: 

  1. Re: But If you did know (Ellin Keene) 
  2. Re: But If you did know ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Message: 1 
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:08:18 -0700 
From: "Ellin Keene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Subject: Re: [Understand] But If you did know 
To: <understand@literacyworkshop.org> 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="us-ascii" 

I just wanted to thank Rhonda for her comments about Chapter 3.  I have 
found the same response from children of all ages when they are given just a 
bit more time to dwell in the idea.  I often think about how I would respond 
if a teacher said (and they often did), "Answer this question, correctly, 
brilliantly, insightfully and FAST!"  I would, in a word, choke.  Yet that's 
what I see all the time when I visit classrooms.  We adults are 
uncomfortable with the silence that is necessary when someone is given the 
necessary time to think, so we fill it in with "anyone else?" or "I'll get 
back to you when you think of something," and they learn quickly to respond 
with, "I don't know" or "I forgot."   



It seems so simple to give them time to think, but I've found that it takes 
a level of discipline that I had to work very hard to obtain.  The results 
almost never disappoint, however.  If everyone took just that one lesson 
from To Understand - give them the time to think and trust that they will 
say something insightful - I'd be a very happy author!  Thanks, Rhonda and 
best to all the list serv readers. 



ellin keene 



------------------------------ 

Message: 2 
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:09:17 EST 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: [Understand] But If you did know 
To: understand@literacyworkshop.org 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" 


You know, Ellin, I think some of this is a symptom of our fast-paced   
culture. Even our reading comprehension tests are quick...time is of the  
essence. 

I have been experimenting with Fountas and Pinnell's new assessment kit and   
they have a great piece for assessing comprehension...the comprehension   
conversation.  It is not about firing questions at kids, but instead it is a 
leisurely conversation about  the book. I like this assessment format a great 
deal 
and think that perhaps if  we did more assessment this way, we would find that 
kids understand more  than we think they do. (It fits nicely, I think with the 
comprehension strategy interviews that you have published...) Some  prompts 
are provided by the authors as conversation starters...and I find that  these 
prompts are needed for some kids...but the prompts are high quality.  They are 
covering "within the text, about the text and beyond the text.".  At the 
higher levels, the prompts get into author's craft---critical thinking.  It 
interested me to discover that the "I know you don't know, but if you did  know 
what 
would you say" worked pretty well in this setting too. I do think that  the 
kids really DIDN'T know...but when I waited, they went back into the text,   
and/or really thought about it and came up with something and those 
"somethings"   
were often brilliant. 

This year, with my third grade "intervention group" I find myself working   
with a group of struggling to average readers who have very little 
understanding 
at all. Most of these students are new to me...I have never worked with   
them before this year and I am now starting my sixth week of  instruction. I am 
a 
bit frustrated. We read the first chapter of  Horrible Harry and the Green 
Slime today. Everyone of these  kids have good surface structure systems in 
place. (They sound wonderful...and  some of their parents can't understand why 
the 
reading specialist is working  with them. ) 

Yet I was appalled at how little they understood. This book is pretty   
simple. Sentence structures are not complex. The school setting is familiar to  
 
children. The kids seemed interested, at least at first, in Horrible Harry.  In 
fact several of them claimed to have read lots of Horrible Harry  books. Each 
chapter is a stand alone...in fact, they don't have to follow  the story from 
chapter to chapter. Usually it is a nice transition book for  kids just 
starting 
chapter books. 

Listening to the conversation after they read, it became very  apparent 
that: they didn't understand that the narrator was a central character,  they 
missed important details (like the setting for the story), had minimal   
understanding of story structure, they missed the humor because they didn't  
understand 
how the events in the story built upon each other. There were some  word 
meanings that were unknown but they didn't know they didn't know the  words! 

It seems that everything leads back to the fact that these kiddos are   
totally lacking in understanding of deep structure systems. AND oh yes, the  
other 
issue is reading speed (they are in a hurry to finish) combined with some   
attentional issues. I don't mean the hyper kind. These kids are  multi-tasking 
in 
their heads! What I am finding is that in this setting,  the "But if you DID 
know..." doesn't work as well as it does in  my other classrooms because they 
are not mentally engaged to begin with.  Maybe if I waited even longer, I would 
get there, but when I keep waiting, I  lose ALL the kids. I have been 
wondering what to do. They need the deep  thinking, but it has been OH so hard 
to set 
up the environment for it. 

SO...here is my plan. The first step is to work on building a sense of   
urgency in order to get them engaged. I plan to spend more time on WHY deep   
thinking about reading is so important, give them some more choice and  control 
of 
book selection and of course more strategy work---lots and lots of  modeling 
about how rewarding it is to put that mental energy into reading. AND I  plan 
to 
get a whole lot more deliberate about helping these little ones  construct 
for themselves the other dimensions of understanding. 

I have had difficult groups before...but this group is using up all my bag   
of tricks at a very rapid rate! Thoughts anyone? 
Jennifer 



In a message dated 11/13/2008 1:09:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,   
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 

I just wanted to thank Rhonda for her comments about Chapter 3.  I  have 
found the same response from children of all ages when they are given  just a 
bit more time to dwell in the idea.  I often think about how I  would respond 
if a teacher said (and they often did), "Answer this  question, correctly, 
brilliantly, insightfully and FAST!"  I would, in  a word, choke.  Yet that's 
what I see all the time when I visit  classrooms.  We adults are 
uncomfortable with the silence that is  necessary when someone is given the 
necessary time to think, so we fill it  in with "anyone else?" or "I'll get 
back to you when you think of  something," and they learn quickly to respond 
with, "I don't know" or "I  forgot."   

ellin keene 





**************Get movies delivered to your mailbox. One month free from 
blockbuster.com 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212639737x1200784900/aol?redir=https://www.blockbuster.com/signup/y/reg/p.26978/r.email_footer)
 


------------------------------ 

_______________________________________________ 
Understand mailing list 
Understand@literacyworkshop.org 
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org 


End of Understand Digest, Vol 9, Issue 8 
**************************************** 
_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
Understand@literacyworkshop.org
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

Reply via email to