[email protected]: > The characters 1FB70โ1FB81 1FBB5โ1FBB8 1FBBC, as specified in Unicode > 13.0โ17.0, are defined with 1รท8 blocks.
No, they're not. That might be in their name, but fonts may render them differently. Notice the following section of this file: https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1FB00.pdf > Fonts > The shapes of the reference glyphs used in these code charts are not > prescriptive. Considerable variation is to beexpected in actual fonts. There are many instances where the name of a codepoint doesn't tell the full story. This is one of them. Fonts can and should render this as something different than 1/8 blocks if their design purpose calls for it. Nitai Sasson
