> There's no doubt that the PET/VIC-20 font and C64 font are two different > fonts.
It seems to me this discussion hinges on the above assertion, while overlooking that Unicode does not encode glyphs in fonts. Peter
> There's no doubt that the PET/VIC-20 font and C64 font are two different > fonts.
It seems to me this discussion hinges on the above assertion, while overlooking that Unicode does not encode glyphs in fonts. Peter