On 06/21/2000 03:09:43 PM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Appropriate or not, users (you know, those people who don't read the >documentation that the programmers don't write) will use text editors to split >files. They will then concatenate the files using a non-Unicode aware tool. >And they will complain that the checksums mismatch. I can't argue against that. I think the suggestion that BOM and ZWNBSP be de-unified, which I have heard before, may make the best sense. Peter Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Juliusz Chroboczek
- RE: UTF-8N? Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8N? Antoine Leca
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Christopher John Fynn
- Re: UTF-8N? Antoine Leca
- RE: UTF-8N? Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan