[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... I think the suggestion that BOM and ZWNBSP be > de-unified, which I have heard before, may make the best sense. *If* that's the solution, it should be done yesterday. The longer it takes the more implementations (and data) there will be that needs to be changed. - Chris
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Juliusz Chroboczek
- RE: UTF-8N? Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8N? Antoine Leca
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Christopher John Fynn
- Re: UTF-8N? Antoine Leca
- RE: UTF-8N? Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable