"Gary L. Wade" wrote:

> The BOM is only useful with UTF-16 or UCS-4 characters.

It's only useful as a mark of byte order. There are others who want to
use it as a charset signature, and there is a Well-Known OS that insists
on doing so.

Attempting to discourage the use of BOMful UTF-8 in interchange is
going to be about as successful as discouraging the use of CP 1252 in
interchange, and for the same reason.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Reply via email to