On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 02:04:11 -0800 (GMT-0800), [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >I'm glad to see that the initial [j-] is not in discussion! Knowing that >"Unicode" begins with a consonant, I can finally select the proper definite >article in Italian: it is thus "lo Unicode", not "l'Unicode". This is getting way off-topic, but I couldn't resist... Just because a word begins with a consonant doesn't rule out the use of an apostrophe. For instance, "uovo" (Italian for "egg") is pronounced /'wOvo/ but takes the truncated form of the article: "l'uovo" /'lwOvo/. But yes, I say "lo Unicode", not "l'Unicode", so I guess what all this discussion boils down to is that Italian has different truncation rules for initial /j/ and /w/. -- marco
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Tex Texin
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Valeriy E. Ushakov
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" John H. Jenkins
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" John Cowan
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Tex Texin
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" John Cowan
- RE: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Antoine Leca
- RE: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Marco Piovanelli
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Antoine Leca
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" John Cowan
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" John Cowan
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" John Cowan
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Peter_Constable
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Peter_Constable
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" john
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" Otto Stolz
- Re: Pronunciation of "Unicode" John Cowan