Hi John, > Or consider IPv6 network addresses. There are > 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 of them. They > won't be assigned densely according to current plans, There are actually still quite a few 32 bit IP addresses not in use. (Does there exist one computer attached to the Internet for every two people alive?) The non-dense packing is the reason we are running out. Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Tex Texin
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Ayers, Mike
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... John Cowan
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Tex Texin
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Ayers, Mike
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Kenneth Whistler
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Joel Rees
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... John Cowan
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Michael Everson
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Michael Everson
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... DougEwell2
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Kenneth Whistler