Michael Everson wrote: > Yes, an alphabet proper is usually the subset of an alphabetic > script. Armenian seems to be the exception, as it is only used for > one language; Georgian, Latin, Cyrillic, Ogham, Runic, and Greek have > been used for other languages. I miss the other language(s) for the Georgian script. (BTW, in a previous message Tamil was given as an example of a single-language script, but I think that it is used also for Sanskrit). _ Marco
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Ayers, Mike
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... John Cowan
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Tex Texin
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Ayers, Mike
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Joel Rees
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... John Cowan
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Michael Everson
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Michael Everson
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... DougEwell2
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Kenneth Whistler