At 03:50 PM 4/20/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I say 0 and 1 are adequate. I find this discussion rather pointless >since we all already know that ASCII is adequate if the given premise >is that ASCII is adequate. I don't see what's there to discuss. We are just trying to see if tautologies still work as advertised or if the need to be updated. A./
- ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) Ayers, Mike
- Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) David Starner
- RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) jarkko . hietaniemi
- Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unic... David Starner
- RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) jarkko . hietaniemi
- Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unic... David Starner
- RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) Asmus Freytag
- RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unic... Edward Cherlin
- RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) jarkko . hietaniemi