>The point is that encodings currently used for French have none of these.

Well, then, just do what the French do: don't use any of them, even though
you may be tempted to use some.


>The ideal for me, rather than adding the missing "e" and "i", would be to
>delete the existing "a" and "o".

So, at least in principle, you're open to the suggestion I offer above.


>Then, I preferred not to venture on the ground languages that I don't know
>well enough. Moreover, talking about a single language, I hoped to avoid
the
>"my-language-too" effect.

So I'm inclined to propose my ideas for phonetics strictly for the purpose
of phonetics.



- Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to