"John H. Jenkins" wrote: > > It is on occasion something of an art figuring out the correct > radical/stroke position for a character in this kind of an index, sad > to say. I'd say, when 2 radicals are possible, put it under both. When 3, well ... you probably get the idea ...
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Thomas Chan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael Everson
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael Everson
- FW: Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- How far afield can we go? (was Re: Re: Erra... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ