At 6:05 PM -0700 7/8/01, Richard Cook wrote: >"John H. Jenkins" wrote: >> >> It is on occasion something of an art figuring out the correct >> radical/stroke position for a character in this kind of an index, sad >> to say. > >I'd say, when 2 radicals are possible, put it under both. When 3, well >... you probably get the idea ... In theory, the Unicode RS index already allows for alternate stroke counts. There's no reason why we cannot allow for alternate radicals as well. -- ===== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael Everson
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael Everson
- FW: Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- How far afield can we go? (was Re: Re: Erra... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson