=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJEYkcyRJJCYkaiRlJCYkOBsoQg==?= writes: > >So you replace radicals with something else. It's the same problem: > >someone not familiar with hanzi are no better served with that method > >than sticking to Kangxi or some other, er, radical, scheme. > > Quick how many strokes in mouth. Bzzt. Wrong. Three, not four. Not a fair question. Obviously someone who has never counted strokes before is going to guess four, until you explain to them the rules, which are quite logical. So you propose that someone has to memorize 200+ radicals in addition to counting strokes? Please. -tree -- Tom Emerson Basis Technology Corp. Sr. Sinostringologist http://www.basistech.com "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity: lick it once and you suck forever"
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Thomas Chan
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael \(michka\) Kaplan