From: "Carl W. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I had presumed that he was able to get Unicode support on NT but not 95. I > did something like this for a VB 3.0 application by writing controls to > extend the language. Indeed, you can get Unicode support on NT -- but that is *real* Unicode support. The only true difference between MSLU http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/Articles/mslu_announce.asp and that article from Avery Bishop (all on one line for the link!): http://www.microsoft.com/msj/0499/multilangUnicode/multilangunicode.htm is that the article describes a framework which then requires you to go do all the work.... whereas MSLU does all the work for you. :-) MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. http://www.trigeminal.com/
