MichKa, > Also, Toby was not attempting to be deceitful, AFAIK. The > original proposal > he submitted (still called UTF-8S) was not in any way > contradictory but many > people objected to various issues within it and the way many things were > presented. The current proposal was a very rushed attempt to > respond to the > feedback. That is good news I had hoped the it did not come for Peoplesoft. However, if a characters set called CESU-8 is registers with IANA then it is really irreverent if it is an internal protocol. Carl
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted DougEwell2
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Starner
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Mark Davis
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Hopwood
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Markus Scherer
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Hopwood
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Starner
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted DougEwell2
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Hopwood
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Marco Cimarosti
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted DougEwell2