MichKa,

> Also, Toby was not attempting to be deceitful, AFAIK. The
> original proposal
> he submitted (still called UTF-8S) was not in any way
> contradictory but many
> people objected to various issues within it and the way many things were
> presented. The current proposal was a very rushed attempt to
> respond to the
> feedback.

That is good news I had hoped the it did not come for Peoplesoft.  However,
if a characters set called CESU-8 is registers with IANA then it is really
irreverent if it is an internal protocol.

Carl


Reply via email to