One technical nit: The document says: 2.1 c. The bit pattern 11110xxx is illegal in any CESU-8 byte, ... In fact, this should say "The bit patterns 1111xxxx are illegal in ..." The changes are subtle: one '0' replaced by 'x' - you want to forbid all bytes >=0xf0 (f0..ff), not just f0..f7. (The other change is that I personally prefer plural "patterns" here.) markus
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Mark Davis
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Hopwood
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted Markus Scherer
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Hopwood
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Starner
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted DougEwell2
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Carl W. Brown
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted David Hopwood
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Marco Cimarosti
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted DougEwell2
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted John Cowan
- Re: PDUTR #26 posted DougEwell2
- RE: PDUTR #26 posted Ayers, Mike

