From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Why would UTF-16 be easier for internal processing than UTF-8? > Both are variable-length encodings. Good straw man! Working with UTF-16 is immensely easier than working with UTF-8. As I am am sure you know! :-) MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. http://www.trigeminal.com/
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support David Starner
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Kenneth Whistler
- RE: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Carl W. Brown
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Markus Scherer
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Yung-Fong Tang
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support David Starner
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Yung-Fong Tang
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Markus Scherer
- RE: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Yves Arrouye
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Andy Heninger
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Andy Heninger
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Andy Heninger
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Andy Heninger
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Tom Emerson
- RE: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Carl W. Brown
- RE: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Tom Emerson
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: 3rd-party cross-platform UTF-8 support Tom Emerson