No, they do work (worked for me with that site I put for Extension B.). MichKa
Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. http://www.trigeminal.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tex Texin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Unicoders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 3:12 PM Subject: Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo > > "Michael (michka) Kaplan" wrote: > > > > The instructions should work for XP. > > > > I would argue that it is up to the client, and the browser, to figure out > > how to display things. Isn't it? :-) > > > Absolutely. I realize its not my personal responsibility to make the > browsers display surrogates, it is their job. But when they don't behave > properly, I think it is good management to apply some coaching (edited > the registry), incentives (rebooted several times), and if needed, some > discipline (I thru the monitor against the wall, but only once.) > > So sure, the browser should figure it out, but if someone had a few good > coaching tips... > ;-) > > > OK, so I take it that is your way of saying surrogates aren't supported > yet... > > tex > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Tex Texin Director, International Business > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +1-781-280-4271 > the Progress Company Fax: +1-781-280-4655 > ------------------------------------------------------------- > For a compelling demonstration for Unicode: > http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html >
