O, by the way, I forgot this... Arjun Aggarwal wrote: > >Yes, there are many easy solutions. The fact is that this > are worth nothing > >until Unicode officially adopts one of them. > > This is the ultimate truth and this was the main point with which i > initiated this dicussion .
Almost every sentence may become the ultimate truth, if you remove enough context to make it meaningless. I can say a lot of tupid things on my own, and I don't need anybody's help to put more stupid things in my mouth. Thanks. My sentence above referred to a very specific problem: finding a way of mapping the ISCII sequence <RA + HALANT + INV> to Unicode. Here is the sentence in its original context: Marco Cimarosti wrote: > Dhrubajyoti Banerjee wrote: [...] > > Marco Cimarosti wrote: [...] > > >I am talking again about REPHA IN ISOLATION: ISCII has a way of > > >representing > > >it, but Unicode does not. This is needed, even only for > > encoding didactic > > >texts, and a solution to encode it (with ZWJ, probably) > > should be found. > > > > I think the same way it is done in ISCII would be quite okay. > > In ISCII you get it by typing the INV character after ra virama. > > A similiar solution may be provided for, in Unicode, by > using ZW(N)J. > > Yes, there are many easy solutions. The fact is that this are > worth nothing > until Unicode officially adopts one of them. _ Marco
