Hi, I used Netscape 6.2 and the Hebrew and Arabic look ok to me. Can you tell me what you believe to be wrong? Maybe send me a screenshot and identify the problem areas?
tex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In Netscape 6, the demo apparently does not support > appropriate directionality for Hebrew and Arabic > characters. > Please check this out. > > Also, when will we have a stylesheet code for > tategaki? They should not use "ideographic" in the > name for tategaki, as tategaki is used often without > ideographs (it is used for the numbers on American > mileposts, for one). Tategaki is also used for kana > calligraphy, not one "ideograph" in there! > > There should be a "tategaki-ltr" and a "tategaki-rtl", > depending on which line of characters is read first. > Which way is Mongolian? > > > I have updated: > > http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html > > > > Persian and Yiddish have been added and Armenian has > changed. > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Get your free email from http://www.ranmamail.com > > Powered by Outblaze -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin Director, International Business mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +1-781-280-4271 the Progress Company Fax: +1-781-280-4655 ------------------------------------------------------------- For a compelling demonstration for Unicode: http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html
