> It is definitely a problem to try to interpret what any given label is > supposed to be. The problem is that MIME labels and others are > ambiguous, and are interpreted different ways on different systems.
Still, in the meantime it does make sense to have EUC-JP associated to the most common interpretation of it, doesn't it? Just for the sake of user satisfaction? I am curious: is there a "better name" for the EUC-JP that ICU is using, that would make everybody understand which one it is? If so, we could have EUC-JP for the one that the rest of the world wants. YA
