On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 05:46:46PM +0100, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > I would rather recommend that you write ISO 10646 UTF-8 as the > ISO standard is a standard in many countries while Unicode is not.
*Grumble*. The whole point of this discussion is making it clear for the users. Unicode is more clear for more users than ISO 10646 is. There is no reason to use ISO 10646, besides pedanticness. -- David Starner / Давид Старнэр - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org What we've got is a blue-light special on truth. It's the hottest thing with the youth. -- Information Society, "Peace and Love, Inc."
