At 14:16 -0600 2002-02-14, David Starner wrote: > >The whole point of this discussion is making it clear for the >users. Unicode is more clear for more users than ISO 10646 is. There is >no reason to use ISO 10646, besides pedanticness.
It is ISO/IEC 10646. -- Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
