-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Lukas Pietsch wrote: > > Would you by chance mean 'threads' ? > > > There is a difference, you know ;-) > > Quite right. And, in order to prove Stefan's point: how about starting a > new thread/threat now about why we Germans are so prone to confuse these > letters, and what consequences that ought to have for a possible > unification of these two characters in Unicode? Any takers?
d is just a glyph variant of t. Encot︀e it as "t <VS1>". ;-) - -- t︀avit︀ Hopwoot︀ <t︀avit︀.hopwoot︀@zetnet.co.uk> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwoot︀/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intent︀et︀ to be legally bint︀ing. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seizet︀ under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBPH021zkCAxeYt5gVAQFlWAf9Gf/YbuG/cYwniJ0gV8MY0/nJv1AU7DyE +nJZ1Bxw9CLT7XGu56pm1TMKPi9Ne7W2XctJkYRm1hl9sraoz1hAUMWhQaGHa4P7 hw1EAVrSgSHfqS0p4fjqNV7BZMwBQwT6y64fn5Iq9gTJXNP+/TKqV71APlkLfA93 Oh71hAlcspPN3bYUTz441d7W0By2Wz++2duD+vaUlRR+vtVgQ0H/6XnyLvg/fyDw dfgIVJz+VelWGIzL5FwRCAtMKi7z6PKJaItgnj93qFgGQaQkeNEn2qVmgsXVqf7s ppBqrb5Lo+NnF4rGbDm60I2S/RZVbk7w9sQuZVLydPvxjGM9N8v/eQ== =20Nw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
