On 03/07/2002 12:20:32 AM "Doug Ewell" wrote: >But I could imagine users wanting to use U+20E3 to enclose an arbitrary >number of characters. >Not that it's a great idea, but I could imagine it.
Sure, one can imagine users wanting it. But the likely reality is that the small number of typical users (who generally don't know the first thing about CGJs) who actually become aware of the possibility will try it, discover they can only find a small number of fonts that support 20e3 at all, and only enclosing one character at that, and so will adjust their expectations, after which brief time they won't be wanting to use 20e3 in this way again. At least, I suspect it would work out something like this. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
