On Mon, 13 May 2002, Amir Herman wrote:
> As conclusion, I would say that we can still preserve the existing U+6AC > because it is not wrong, only the glyph is not standard and limited in > its use. Later on I might send some images to clarify my argument. The > task now is to add another glyph that could present the standard and > most common glyph of 'GA'. To view a full standard jawi alphabet please > refer to: > > http://www.omniglot.com/writing/malay.htm > http://www.linguistsoftware.com/ljawi.htm It seems that your references don't agree! Although both have a Keheh With Dot Above, one has Kaf, and another has Keheh in the list of letters. BTW, after hearing Marco's and others' comments, and seeing the examples, I believe that we should not touch the old character, but we should encode a new ARABIC LETTER KEHEH WITH DOT ABOVE. I will look forward to see a proposal, with samples from published documents. roozbeh
